BBC News, 4/30/08 - A bill outlawing the possession of "extreme pornography" is set to become law next week. But many fear it has been rushed through and will criminalise innocent people with a harmless taste for unconventional sex.

Five years ago Jane Longhurst, a teacher from Brighton, was murdered. It later emerged her killer had been compulsively accessing websites such as Club Dead and Rape Action, which contained images of women being abused and violated.

When Graham Coutts was jailed for life Jane Longhurst's mother, Liz, began a campaign to ban the possession of such images.

Supported by her local MP, Martin Salter, she found a listening ear in then home secretary, David Blunkett, who agreed to introduce legislation to ban the possession of "violent and extreme pornography".

This was eventually included in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, which gets its final reading this week and will get Royal Assent on 8 May.

Until now pornographers, rather than consumers, have needed to operate within the confines of the 1959 Obscene Publications Act (OPA). While this law will remain, the new act is designed to reflect the realities of the internet age, when pornographic images may be hosted on websites outside the UK.

Under the new rules, criminal responsibility shifts from the producer - who is responsible under the OPA - to the consumer.

But campaigners say the new law risks criminalising thousands of people who use violent pornographic images as part of consensual sexual relationships.

People like Helen, who by day works in an office in the Midlands, and enjoys being sexually submissive and occasionally watching pornography, portrayed by actors, which could be banned under the new legislation.

She feels the new law is an over-reaction to the Longhurst case.
"Mrs Longhurst sees this man having done this to her daughter and she wants something to blame and rather than blame this psychotic man she wants to change the law but she doesn't really understand the situation," says Helen.

"Do you ban alcohol just because some people are alcoholics?"

She has an ally in Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer, a Liberal Democrat peer who has fought to have the legislation amended.

"Obviously anything that leads to violence against women has to be taken very seriously," says Baroness Miller. "But you have to be very careful about the definition of 'extreme pornography' and they have not nearly been careful enough."

She has suggested the new act adopt the legal test set out in the OPA, which bans images which "tend to deprave and corrupt".

But the government has sought to broaden the definition and the bill includes phrases such as "an act which threatens or appears to threaten a person's life".

Speaking from her home in Berkshire, Mrs Longhurst acknowledges that libertarians see her as "a horrible killjoy". 

"I'm not. I do not approve of this stuff but there is room for all sorts of different people. But anything which is going to cause damage to other people needs to be stopped."

To those who fear the legislation might criminalise people who use violent pornography as a harmless sex aid, she responds with a blunt "hard luck".

"There is no reason for this stuff. I can't see why people need to see it. People say what about our human rights but where are Jane's human rights?"

Recently, the much-publicised rompings of Formula 1 boss Max Mosley have served as a reminder that kinky sex is found in all walks of society.

And just as Mr Mosley is fighting the expose of his antics, calling it an invasion of private life, so Baroness Miller says the new law also threatens people's privacy.

"The government is effectively walking into people's bedrooms and saying you can't do this. It's a form of thought police."

She says there's a danger of "criminalising kinkiness" and fears the legislation has been rushed through Parliament without proper debate because it is a small part of a wider bill.

Deborah Hyde, of Backlash, an umbrella group of anti-censorship and alternative sexuality pressure groups, has similar concerns.

"How many tens or hundreds or thousands of people are going to be dragged into a police station, have their homes turned upside down, their computers stolen and their neighbours suspecting them of all sorts?"

Such "victims" won't feel able to fight the case and "will take a caution, before there are enough test cases to prove that this law is unnecessary and unworkable".

Another opponent of the new law is Edward Garnier, an MP and part-time judge, who questioned the clause when it was debated in the Commons.

"My primary concern is the vagueness of the offence," says Mr Garnier. "It was very subjective and it would not be clear to me how anybody would know if an offence had been committed."

But the Ministry of Justice is unrepentant, saying the sort of images it is seeking to outlaw are out of place in modern-day Britain.

"Pornographic material which depicts necrophilia, bestiality or violence that is life threatening or likely to result in serious injury to the anus, breasts or genitals has no place in a modern society and should not be tolerated," says a spokeswoman for the ministry.

Yet opponents have also seized on what they see as an anomaly in the new law, noted by Lord Wallace of Tankerness during last week's debate in the House of Lords.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," he said.

With that partly in mind, the government is tabling an amendment that would allow couples to keep pictures of themselves engaged in consensual acts - but not to distribute them. Lord Hunt, who has charge of the bill in the Lords, admits it is being rushed through to meet a deadline. But he denies the law has not been thoroughly considered and maintains it will only affect images that are "grossly offensive and disgusting".

More ...

UK Crackdown on violent net porn

LONDON - Evening Standard, 15 August 2005 - A crackdown on brutal internet porn is set to be announced by ministers.

Websites glamorising sexual violence will be targeted using methods similar to those deployed against child pornography.

Police could be given greater powers to pursue offenders, The Daily Telegraph reveals.

Proposals are expected to be announced in the next few months following international talks.

The action comes after Home Secretary Charles Clarke met the mother of 31-year-old teacher Jane Longhurst who was murdered by a male friend who was addicted to violent internet porn.

The family of Miss Longhurst, from Brighton, East Sussex, were shocked such material was freely available.

Any British site which carries illegal violent porn can be closed down.

But lack of an international agreement on what is obscene means pictures of women being abused posted on websites abroad are easily accessible.

Now viewing such material from the UK could now be made an offence.

"We are looking at ways in which the current law might be strengthened," a Home Office spokeswoman confirmed. "We want to do all we can to block access to illegal sites."

Also, From BBC News ...

Porn law hopes for Jane's mother

Mrs Longhurst hopes action will be taken on internet porn.The mother of murdered teacher Jane Longhurst has welcomed reports that the government is set to announce a crackdown on violent internet porn. Methods used to combat child porn are set to be drawn upon and police officers could be given greater powers.

Liz Longhurst, 74, of Reading, Berkshire, said new legislation would mean her daughter's death "would not have been entirely in vain".

Porn-obsessed Graham Coutts killed her daughter in Hove, East Sussex, in 2003.

Since his conviction, Mrs Longhurst has led a campaign calling for action to block access to internet sites depicting violent pornography, wherever they are based in the world.

On Monday, it was claimed in the national press that details of new international action are set to be announced in the next few months.

Mrs Longhurst told the BBC News website: "I'm glad that it's going to be happening.

"It's obviously something to do with our campaign. If it had not been for the publicity surrounding my daughter's horrendous death, and starting off the trust and the campaign, I think nothing much would have been done.

"If something is brought in I will feel that my daughter's death would not have been entirely in vain."

Mrs Longhurst, who met Home Secretary Charles Clarke in the Commons for hour-long talks earlier this year, said that until new laws were actually approved she would keep pushing her campaign.

It has so far seen 32,000 people sign a petition calling for the ban - and Mrs Longhurst wants to reach her target of 100,000 by next Spring.

"I'm still very keen to get more people to sign my petition because I feel this is the way the climate of opinion can be changed and things do not happen unless the climate of opinion has been changed," she explained.

This page contains copyrighted material and is made available to better understand pornography, e.g., its effect on society. It is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in receiving the information for research and educational purposes.